Epic vs. Google & Samsung
What’s the deal with Epic Games suing Google and Samsung again? Is it really about “all developers” or just Epic’s own agenda?
By Sarah Kim
Epic Games is back in the courtroom, and this time, they’re not just going after Google—they’ve got Samsung in their crosshairs too. If you’ve been following the tech world for the past few years, you might remember Epic’s first lawsuit against Google back in 2020. That one was all about Google’s alleged app store monopoly and the fees it charges developers for in-app purchases. But now, Epic is turning up the heat, claiming that Samsung’s “Auto Blocker” feature is part of a shady deal with Google to stifle competition.
So, what’s this “Auto Blocker” feature, and why is it such a big deal? Well, according to Epic, Samsung’s Auto Blocker prevents users from installing apps unless they come from “authorized sources.” In other words, it’s like putting up a digital fence around your phone, making it harder for users to sideload apps from outside the Google Play Store. And guess who benefits from that? Yep, you guessed it—Google.
But wait, there’s more! Epic claims that Samsung and Google have been “coordinating” to get around a previous trial verdict that ruled against Google’s app store practices. According to Arstechnica, Epic argues that Samsung’s Auto Blocker essentially creates a “moat” around Google, protecting its app store monopoly and making it even harder for competitors to break through.
Now, if you’re thinking, “Didn’t Epic already sue Google for this?” you’re not wrong. This new lawsuit is like the sequel to a movie you didn’t ask for but can’t stop watching. The first lawsuit was all about Google’s Play Store fees and how they allegedly stifle competition. This time, Epic is zeroing in on Samsung’s role in the whole mess, accusing them of helping Google maintain its monopoly by limiting users’ ability to sideload apps.
Is Epic Really Fighting for “All Developers”?
Here’s where things get a little murky. Epic’s CEO, Tim Sweeney, has been pretty vocal about the company’s mission to “fight for all developers.” He claims that by taking on tech giants like Google and Samsung, Epic is standing up for the little guys—the indie developers and smaller companies that can’t afford to pay Google’s hefty fees or navigate the complicated app store rules.
But not everyone is buying it. Some critics argue that Epic is really just looking out for itself. After all, Epic’s own app, Fortnite, was at the center of the original lawsuit. When Google booted Fortnite from the Play Store for violating its payment policies, Epic fired back with a lawsuit, claiming that Google was abusing its power. So, is this really about “all developers,” or is Epic just trying to get a better deal for itself?
It’s a fair question, and one that’s been hotly debated in tech circles. On one hand, Epic’s lawsuit could pave the way for more competition in the app store space, which would be a win for developers and consumers alike. On the other hand, it’s hard to ignore the fact that Epic stands to gain a lot if they come out on top.
What’s Next for the Lawsuit?
As of now, it’s too early to say how this lawsuit will play out. Google and Samsung have yet to respond to the latest claims, but you can bet they’ll be fighting back hard. After all, there’s a lot at stake here—not just for Epic, but for the entire app store ecosystem.
If Epic wins, it could force Google and Samsung to change the way they handle app distribution, potentially opening the door for more competition. That could mean lower fees for developers, more choices for consumers, and a more open app store landscape. But if Google and Samsung manage to fend off the lawsuit, it could solidify their control over the app store market, making it even harder for competitors to break through.
So, what do you think? Is Epic really fighting for the little guys, or are they just looking out for themselves? And what does this mean for the future of app stores? One thing’s for sure—this is one tech battle you won’t want to miss.